Head to head · Career pitching
Cole Hamels vs Clayton Kershaw
In 2020 Clayton Kershaw has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Two of the 25 most valuable pitching careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cole Hamels | Clayton Kershaw |
|---|---|---|
| G | 423 | 455 |
| GS | 422 | 451 |
| IP | 2,698.0 | 2,855.1 |
| W | 163 | 223 |
| L | 122 | 96 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 2,560 | 3,052 |
| BB | 767 | 713 |
| ERA | 3.43 | 2.53 |
| WHIP | 1.18 | 1.02 |
| K/9 | 8.5 | 9.6 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| HR/9 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| WAR | 47.3 | 74.4 |
2020 season
| Statistic | Cole Hamels | Clayton Kershaw |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1 | 10 |
| GS | 1 | 10 |
| IP | 3.1 | 58.1 |
| W | 0 | 6 |
| SO | 2 | 62 |
| ERA | 8.10 | 2.16 |
| FIP | 2.89 | 3.31 |
| WHIP | 1.20 | 0.84 |
| K/9 | 5.4 | 9.6 |
| BB/9 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
| FIP− | 65 | 74 |
| WAR | 0.1 | 1.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cole Hamels | Clayton Kershaw |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 41 |
| GS | 16 | 32 |
| IP | 100.1 | 196.2 |
| W | 7 | 13 |
| SV | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 93 | 213 |
| BB | 27 | 54 |
| ERA | 3.41 | 4.62 |
| WHIP | 1.10 | 1.14 |
| K/9 | 8.3 | 9.7 |
| BB/9 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.