DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · Career pitching

Félix Hernández vs John Lackey

In 2017 John Lackey has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticFélix HernándezJohn Lackey
G419364
GS418363
IP2,729.22,329.2
W169155
L136114
SV00
SO2,5241,930
BB805656
ERA3.423.81
WHIP1.211.27
K/98.37.5
BB/92.72.5
HR/90.91.0
WAR49.635.1

2017 season

2017 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticFélix HernándezJohn Lackey
G1631
GS1630
IP86.2170.2
W612
SO78149
ERA4.364.59
FIP5.025.30
WHIP1.291.28
K/98.17.9
BB/92.72.8
FIP−115122
WAR0.30.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticFélix HernándezJohn Lackey
G—24
GS—20
IP—121.2
W—6
SV—0
SO—97
BB—41
ERA—3.62
WHIP—1.27
K/9—7.2
BB/9—3.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.