DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · Career pitching

Max Scherzer vs Stephen Strasburg

In 2022 Max Scherzer has been worth 4.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticMax ScherzerStephen Strasburg
G501247
GS492247
IP3,047.21,470.0
W225113
L12662
SV00
SO3,5571,723
BB814394
ERA3.293.24
WHIP1.091.10
K/910.510.5
BB/92.42.4
HR/91.10.9
WAR66.436.3

2022 season

2022 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticMax ScherzerStephen Strasburg
G231
GS231
IP145.14.2
W110
SO1735
ERA2.2913.50
FIP2.625.68
WHIP0.912.14
K/910.79.6
BB/91.53.9
FIP−66143
WAR4.0-0.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticMax ScherzerStephen Strasburg
G339
GS288
IP157.155.1
W86
SV10
SO18271
BB628
ERA3.781.46
WHIP1.160.94
K/910.411.5
BB/93.51.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.