DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Nathan Eovaldi vs Tarik Skubal

In 2026 Tarik Skubal has been worth 3.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTarik Skubal
G2726
GS2326
IP145.2158.2
W1112
SO144186
ERA4.202.72
FIP4.192.51
WHIP1.220.96
K/98.910.6
BB/92.21.5
FIP−10060
WAR1.54.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTarik Skubal
G178
GS128
IP79.250.2
W93
SV00
SO8270
BB1810
ERA3.052.13
WHIP1.040.79
K/99.312.4
BB/92.01.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticNathan EovaldiTarik Skubal
G343163
GS320160
IP1,848.0925.1
W11366
L9444
SV00
SO1,6311,075
BB501199
ERA3.923.02
WHIP1.251.01
K/97.910.5
BB/92.41.9
HR/91.01.0
WAR28.723.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.