DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Kyle Hendricks vs Brandon Pfaadt

In 2025 Brandon Pfaadt has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticKyle HendricksBrandon Pfaadt
G3133
GS3133
IP164.2176.2
W813
SO114147
ERA4.765.25
FIP4.604.22
WHIP1.281.33
K/96.27.5
BB/92.41.9
FIP−111101
WAR1.22.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticKyle HendricksBrandon Pfaadt
G125
GS115
IP57.222.0
W20
SV00
SO5126
BB165
ERA3.123.27
WHIP1.201.09
K/98.010.6
BB/92.52.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticKyle HendricksBrandon Pfaadt
G307113
GS301102
IP1,745.0590.1
W10535
L9131
SV00
SO1,373520
BB407137
ERA3.794.82
WHIP1.191.28
K/97.17.9
BB/92.12.1
HR/91.11.3
WAR25.17.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.