Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Farmer vs Jake Meyers

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Farmer ATL

Jake Meyers HOU

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Farmer	Jake Meyers
G	11	45
PA	17	153
H	4	30
HR	0	3
RBI	3	11
SB	0	1
AVG	.250	.213
OBP	.235	.268
SLG	.313	.326
OPS	.548	.594
ISO	.063	.113
BB%	0.0%	6.5%
K%	23.5%	20.3%
wOBA	.232	.266
wRC+	39	65
WAR	-0.1	-0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Farmer	Jake Meyers
G	779	477
PA	2,404	1,711
H	541	373
2B	103	72
3B	7	8
HR	63	36
RBI	288	172
BB	134	119
SO	491	407
SB	16	38
AVG	.247	.241
SLG	.387	.367
WAR	4.9	4.2

Kyle Farmer’s full profile →Jake Meyers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Farmer vs

Jake Meyers vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.