DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Steven Matz vs Tyler Rogers

In 2026 Tyler Rogers has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticSteven MatzTyler Rogers
G3674
GS110
IP80.171.0
W62
SO6140
ERA5.491.77
FIP5.023.36
WHIP1.231.17
K/96.85.1
BB/92.82.8
FIP−12080
WAR-0.11.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticSteven MatzTyler Rogers
G104
GS30
IP23.03.1
W01
SV00
SO171
BB71
ERA2.740.00
WHIP1.261.80
K/96.72.7
BB/92.72.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticSteven MatzTyler Rogers
G282494
GS1830
IP1,084.2495.0
W6628
L6826
SV323
SO1,001346
BB31699
ERA4.292.62
WHIP1.301.11
K/98.36.3
BB/92.61.8
HR/91.40.5
WAR11.27.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.