DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Shelby Miller vs Matt Strahm

In 2025 Matt Strahm has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticShelby MillerMatt Strahm
G4866
GS00
IP46.062.1
W42
SO5470
ERA2.742.74
FIP3.442.99
WHIP1.041.07
K/910.610.1
BB/92.92.9
FIP−8372
WAR0.71.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticShelby MillerMatt Strahm
G617
GS20
IP15.212.0
W00
SV01
SO1510
BB64
ERA4.606.00
WHIP1.471.67
K/98.67.5
BB/93.43.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticShelby MillerMatt Strahm
G302436
GS13335
IP921.2553.0
W5137
L6942
SV1315
SO789612
BB359164
ERA4.043.61
WHIP1.311.13
K/97.710.0
BB/93.52.7
HR/91.01.2
WAR8.26.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.