DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Taylor Rogers vs Steven Wilson

In 2025 the two have been worth the same 0.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticTaylor RogersSteven Wilson
G5759
GS00
IP50.255.1
W32
SO5351
ERA3.383.42
FIP4.384.29
WHIP1.381.30
K/99.48.3
BB/94.13.6
FIP−105103
WAR0.20.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTaylor RogersSteven Wilson
G54
GS00
IP4.13.2
W00
SV00
SO44
BB13
ERA4.154.91
WHIP1.151.36
K/98.39.8
BB/92.17.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticTaylor RogersSteven Wilson
G631201
GS01
IP601.2196.0
W378
L4012
SV853
SO680195
BB19695
ERA3.443.86
WHIP1.231.25
K/910.29.0
BB/92.94.4
HR/90.91.3
WAR9.0-0.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.