DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Jason Adam vs Danny Coulombe

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticJason AdamDanny Coulombe
G3829
GS00
IP34.122.0
W20
SO2210
ERA2.624.50
FIP4.854.97
WHIP1.171.50
K/95.84.1
BB/92.66.1
FIP−116119
WAR-0.1-0.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticJason AdamDanny Coulombe
G103
GS00
IP10.21.2
W00
SV00
SO82
BB21
ERA2.530.00
WHIP0.941.20
K/96.810.8
BB/91.75.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticJason AdamDanny Coulombe
G379372
GS02
IP369.1338.2
W2917
L1712
SV265
SO412322
BB134130
ERA2.683.43
WHIP1.041.22
K/910.08.6
BB/93.33.5
HR/91.00.9
WAR4.33.9

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.