Head to head · 2025 batting

Mark Canha vs Michael Massey

In 2025 Michael Massey has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Mark Canha KC

Michael Massey KC

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mark Canha	Michael Massey
G	46	76
PA	125	277
H	24	64
HR	1	3
RBI	6	20
SB	0	2
AVG	.212	.244
OBP	.272	.268
SLG	.265	.313
OPS	.537	.581
ISO	.053	.069
BB%	5.6%	3.2%
K%	19.2%	15.5%
wOBA	.246	.256
wRC+	53	60
WAR	-0.5	-0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Mark Canha	Michael Massey
G	14	6
PA	54	25
H	7	7
HR	1	0
RBI	3	1
BB	5	2
SO	14	6
SB	0	0
AVG	.149	.304
OBP	.241	.360
SLG	.213	.435
OPS	.454	.795

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Mark Canha	Michael Massey
G	1,082	483
PA	4,128	1,740
H	879	404
2B	179	78
3B	14	5
HR	121	49
RBI	465	186
BB	410	78
SO	845	319
SB	50	15
AVG	.248	.250
SLG	.409	.395
WAR	15.9	3.4

Mark Canha’s full profile →Michael Massey’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mark Canha vs

Michael Massey vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.