Head to head · Career pitching

Kevin Gausman vs Jake Peavy

In 2016 Kevin Gausman has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable pitching careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Kevin Gausman BAL

Jake Peavy SF

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Kevin Gausman	Jake Peavy
G	393	312
GS	354	301
IP	2,088.2	1,918.1
W	121	119
L	125	102
SV	0	0
SO	2,138	1,788
BB	582	540
ERA	3.87	3.66
WHIP	1.24	1.17
K/9	9.2	8.4
BB/9	2.5	2.5
HR/9	1.1	0.9
WAR	37.9	34.3

2016 season

2016 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kevin Gausman	Jake Peavy
G	30	31
GS	30	21
IP	179.2	118.2
W	9	5
SO	174	102
ERA	3.61	5.54
FIP	4.10	4.36
WHIP	1.28	1.43
K/9	8.7	7.7
BB/9	2.4	2.7
FIP−	98	104
WAR	2.2	1.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Kevin Gausman	Jake Peavy
G	15	9
GS	9	9
IP	59.2	38.1
W	2	1
SV	0	0
SO	57	21
BB	22	17
ERA	4.07	7.98
WHIP	1.04	1.83
K/9	8.6	4.9
BB/9	3.3	4.0

Kevin Gausman’s full profile →Jake Peavy’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kevin Gausman vs

Jake Peavy vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.