Head to head · 2025 batting

Hunter Renfroe vs Ben Rortvedt

In 2025 Ben Rortvedt has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Hunter Renfroe KC

Ben Rortvedt TB

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Hunter Renfroe	Ben Rortvedt
G	32	41
PA	108	128
H	18	17
HR	0	1
RBI	4	10
SB	0	0
AVG	.182	.152
OBP	.241	.240
SLG	.242	.205
OPS	.483	.445
ISO	.061	.054
BB%	7.4%	8.6%
K%	19.4%	18.0%
wOBA	.222	.214
wRC+	36	29
WAR	-0.7	-0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Hunter Renfroe	Ben Rortvedt
G	23	4
PA	73	10
H	11	3
HR	2	0
RBI	8	1
BB	9	0
SO	26	3
SB	1	0
AVG	.172	.429
OBP	.274	.500
SLG	.313	.571
OPS	.586	1.071

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Hunter Renfroe	Ben Rortvedt
G	981	222
PA	3,763	661
H	808	111
2B	186	18
3B	4	0
HR	192	9
RBI	510	53
BB	289	62
SO	926	168
SB	15	1
AVG	.236	.189
SLG	.461	.266
WAR	9.3	-0.3

Hunter Renfroe’s full profile →Ben Rortvedt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Hunter Renfroe vs

Ben Rortvedt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.