DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · Career pitching

Jacob deGrom vs Max Scherzer

In 2026 Jacob deGrom has been worth 3.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticJacob deGromMax Scherzer
G279501
GS279492
IP1,702.13,047.2
W107225
L76126
SV00
SO2,0523,557
BB391814
ERA2.733.29
WHIP1.001.09
K/910.810.5
BB/92.12.4
HR/90.91.1
WAR47.266.4

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticJacob deGromMax Scherzer
G3118
GS3118
IP162.284.2
W114
SO20168
ERA4.205.74
FIP3.125.11
WHIP1.141.33
K/911.17.2
BB/92.53.7
FIP−75122
WAR3.90.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticJacob deGromMax Scherzer
G533
GS528
IP31.0157.1
W48
SV01
SO37182
BB1062
ERA2.903.78
WHIP1.161.16
K/910.710.4
BB/92.93.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.