DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Steven Okert vs Randy Rodríguez

In 2025 Steven Okert has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticSteven OkertRandy Rodríguez
G6850
GS10
IP71.250.2
W33
SO8467
ERA3.011.78
FIP2.762.40
WHIP0.890.89
K/910.511.9
BB/92.42.0
FIP−6658
WAR1.61.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticSteven OkertRandy Rodríguez
G1—
GS0—
IP1.0—
W0—
SV0—
SO1—
BB0—
ERA9.00—
WHIP2.00—
K/99.0—
BB/90.0—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticSteven OkertRandy Rodríguez
G40885
GS51
IP369.0103.0
W246
L157
SV24
SO405120
BB12929
ERA3.413.06
WHIP1.091.07
K/99.910.5
BB/93.12.5
HR/91.10.7
WAR3.72.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.