DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Nick Pivetta vs Blake Snell

In 2026 Blake Snell has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticNick PivettaBlake Snell
G89
GS89
IP34.242.2
W34
SO4255
ERA2.861.90
FIP2.211.72
WHIP1.011.10
K/910.911.6
BB/92.13.4
FIP−5341
WAR1.21.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticNick PivettaBlake Snell
G620
GS417
IP26.192.1
W17
SV01
SO31116
BB743
ERA3.083.41
WHIP1.031.18
K/910.611.3
BB/92.44.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticNick PivettaBlake Snell
G262232
GS217231
IP1,245.21,200.2
W7285
L7863
SV30
SO1,3711,495
BB435537
ERA4.433.10
WHIP1.261.22
K/99.911.2
BB/93.14.0
HR/91.40.8
WAR15.327.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.