DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Scott Barlow vs Jimmy Herget

In 2026 Jimmy Herget has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticScott BarlowJimmy Herget
G3651
GS03
IP33.153.2
W20
SO2947
ERA6.485.70
FIP6.435.40
WHIP1.351.53
K/97.87.9
BB/95.14.4
FIP−154129
WAR-0.6-0.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticScott BarlowJimmy Herget
G1—
GS0—
IP1.2—
W0—
SV0—
SO4—
BB0—
ERA0.00—
WHIP0.00—
K/921.6—
BB/90.0—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticScott BarlowJimmy Herget
G476239
GS16
IP488.2292.0
W318
L2417
SV6112
SO565269
BB22899
ERA3.793.64
WHIP1.291.24
K/910.48.3
BB/94.23.1
HR/90.91.0
WAR5.82.7

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.