DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Scott Barlow vs Fraser Ellard

In 2025 the two have been worth the same 0.0 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticScott BarlowFraser Ellard
G7518
GS13
IP68.117.0
W61
SO7522
ERA4.214.24
FIP4.704.84
WHIP1.391.59
K/99.911.6
BB/95.910.1
FIP−113116
WAR-0.0-0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
StatisticScott BarlowFraser Ellard
G47643
GS13
IP488.241.0
W313
L245
SV611
SO56548
BB22831
ERA3.793.95
WHIP1.291.39
K/910.410.5
BB/94.26.8
HR/90.90.9
WAR5.80.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.