Head to head · 2024 batting

J.D. Davis vs Mitch Haniger

In 2024 J.D. Davis has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.D. Davis OAK

Mitch Haniger SEA

2024 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.D. Davis	Mitch Haniger
G	46	121
PA	157	423
H	31	79
HR	4	12
RBI	6	44
SB	0	0
AVG	.218	.208
OBP	.293	.286
SLG	.338	.334
OPS	.631	.620
ISO	.120	.126
BB%	7.6%	9.5%
K%	24.8%	29.8%
wOBA	.284	.279
wRC+	81	82
WAR	-0.1	-0.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	J.D. Davis	Mitch Haniger
G	634	744
PA	2,151	3,089
H	486	688
2B	93	134
3B	3	11
HR	72	130
RBI	221	395
BB	210	272
SO	586	774
SB	7	19
AVG	.257	.250
SLG	.423	.448
WAR	7.6	10.4

J.D. Davis’s full profile →Mitch Haniger’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.D. Davis vs

Mitch Haniger vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.