Head to head · 2025 pitching

Jacob Barnes vs Kyle Finnegan

In 2025 Kyle Finnegan has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jacob Barnes TOR

Kyle Finnegan WSH

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jacob Barnes	Kyle Finnegan
G	6	56
GS	0	0
IP	8.0	57.0
W	0	4
SO	5	55
ERA	9.00	3.47
FIP	4.64	3.12
WHIP	1.63	1.11
K/9	5.6	8.7
BB/9	3.4	2.8
FIP−	111	75
WAR	0.0	1.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Jacob Barnes	Kyle Finnegan
G	334	410
GS	1	0
IP	336.2	408.0
W	16	29
L	21	31
SV	7	114
SO	322	390
BB	134	169
ERA	4.79	3.66
WHIP	1.40	1.34
K/9	8.6	8.6
BB/9	3.6	3.7
HR/9	1.1	1.2
WAR	2.2	2.1

Jacob Barnes’s full profile →Kyle Finnegan’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jacob Barnes vs

Kyle Finnegan vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.