Head to head · 2026 pitching

Colin Rea vs Blade Tidwell

In 2026 Colin Rea has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Colin Rea CHC

Blade Tidwell SF

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Colin Rea	Blade Tidwell
G	34	17
GS	19	9
IP	137.0	56.2
W	8	1
SO	101	46
ERA	4.34	4.45
FIP	4.80	4.74
WHIP	1.33	1.18
K/9	6.6	7.3
BB/9	3.1	3.3
FIP−	115	113
WAR	0.4	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Colin Rea	Blade Tidwell
G	160	21
GS	122	11
IP	743.0	71.2
W	45	2
L	35	3
SV	4	1
SO	594	56
BB	229	31
ERA	4.40	5.40
WHIP	1.28	1.40
K/9	7.2	7.0
BB/9	2.8	3.9
HR/9	1.4	1.5
WAR	4.5	-0.3

Colin Rea’s full profile →Blade Tidwell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Colin Rea vs

Blade Tidwell vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.