Head to head · 2026 pitching

Kyle Freeland vs Michael McGreevy

So far in 2026 Michael McGreevy has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Freeland COL

Michael McGreevy STL

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Freeland	Michael McGreevy
G	25	30
GS	24	30
IP	128.1	164.0
W	4	7
SO	104	113
ERA	6.38	3.84
FIP	5.01	4.25
WHIP	1.47	1.25
K/9	7.3	6.2
BB/9	2.0	2.5
FIP−	120	101
WAR	0.5	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Freeland	Michael McGreevy
G	261	51
GS	255	49
IP	1,388.2	282.2
W	69	18
L	100	13
SV	0	0
SO	1,048	189
BB	420	68
ERA	4.71	3.88
WHIP	1.42	1.21
K/9	6.8	6.0
BB/9	2.7	2.2
HR/9	1.3	1.1
WAR	13.6	3.3

Kyle Freeland’s full profile →Michael McGreevy’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Freeland vs

Michael McGreevy vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.