DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Paul Blackburn vs Matt Bowman

In 2025 Paul Blackburn has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticPaul BlackburnMatt Bowman
G1520
GS40
IP39.024.2
W00
SO3418
ERA6.236.20
FIP4.394.76
WHIP1.511.50
K/97.86.6
BB/92.82.2
FIP−106114
WAR0.2-0.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticPaul BlackburnMatt Bowman
G5—
GS0—
IP7.1—
W0—
SV0—
SO0—
BB1—
ERA4.91—
WHIP1.09—
K/90.0—
BB/91.2—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticPaul BlackburnMatt Bowman
G163231
GS881
IP552.1240.2
W298
L3414
SV22
SO432194
BB17783
ERA4.464.38
WHIP1.371.30
K/97.07.3
BB/92.93.1
HR/91.10.9
WAR5.22.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.