DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Evan Phillips vs Ian Seymour

In 2026 Ian Seymour has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticEvan PhillipsIan Seymour
G3147
GS016
IP26.0132.2
W39
SO33158
ERA3.464.21
FIP3.874.10
WHIP1.081.13
K/911.410.7
BB/92.12.4
FIP−9398
WAR0.31.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticEvan PhillipsIan Seymour
G179
GS00
IP18.110.0
W32
SV10
SO2415
BB103
ERA0.004.50
WHIP1.041.50
K/911.813.5
BB/94.92.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticEvan PhillipsIan Seymour
G28166
GS121
IP278.0189.2
W1913
L1410
SV472
SO324222
BB9855
ERA3.374.03
WHIP1.131.14
K/910.510.5
BB/93.22.6
HR/90.91.4
WAR4.22.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.