DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Dane Dunning vs Joel Payamps

In 2025 Joel Payamps has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticDane DunningJoel Payamps
G1230
GS00
IP20.226.1
W00
SO2124
ERA6.976.84
FIP5.074.54
WHIP1.501.52
K/99.18.2
BB/93.03.1
FIP−122109
WAR-0.10.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticDane DunningJoel Payamps
G63
GS10
IP7.23.1
W10
SV00
SO53
BB54
ERA4.708.10
WHIP1.962.40
K/95.98.1
BB/95.910.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticDane DunningJoel Payamps
G136261
GS1021
IP593.1276.2
W2814
L3224
SV210
SO538253
BB22084
ERA4.443.55
WHIP1.371.19
K/98.28.2
BB/93.32.7
HR/91.21.1
WAR5.12.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.