DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Génesis Cabrera vs Chad Green

In 2025 Génesis Cabrera has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticGénesis CabreraChad Green
G4045
GS00
IP42.243.2
W03
SO3535
ERA6.545.56
FIP6.566.73
WHIP1.501.47
K/97.47.2
BB/93.82.7
FIP−158162
WAR-0.9-1.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticGénesis CabreraChad Green
G519
GS01
IP3.127.1
W03
SV00
SO428
BB39
ERA5.403.95
WHIP1.501.17
K/910.89.2
BB/98.13.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticGénesis CabreraChad Green
G313382
GS224
IP318.1492.2
W1743
L1530
SV629
SO303591
BB154127
ERA4.243.43
WHIP1.371.07
K/98.610.8
BB/94.42.3
HR/91.31.4
WAR-0.36.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.