Head to head · 2026 pitching

Jalen Beeks vs Trent Thornton

In 2026 Jalen Beeks has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jalen Beeks TEX

Trent Thornton CHC

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jalen Beeks	Trent Thornton
G	29	48
GS	0	0
IP	26.0	48.1
W	2	5
SO	21	31
ERA	3.81	3.35
FIP	5.41	5.21
WHIP	1.38	1.20
K/9	7.3	5.8
BB/9	2.8	3.2
FIP−	129	125
WAR	-0.2	-0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Jalen Beeks	Trent Thornton
G	292	283
GS	21	36
IP	431.0	449.1
W	30	19
L	19	24
SV	16	4
SO	397	410
BB	166	153
ERA	4.28	4.27
WHIP	1.37	1.32
K/9	8.3	8.2
BB/9	3.5	3.1
HR/9	1.0	1.4
WAR	3.6	2.2

Jalen Beeks’s full profile →Trent Thornton’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jalen Beeks vs

Trent Thornton vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.