Head to head · 2026 pitching

Griffin Canning vs Cade Povich

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Griffin Canning SD

Cade Povich BAL

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Griffin Canning	Cade Povich
G	28	8
GS	11	7
IP	83.2	37.0
W	4	2
SO	83	28
ERA	5.59	4.38
FIP	4.68	4.99
WHIP	1.51	1.49
K/9	8.9	6.8
BB/9	4.1	3.6
FIP−	112	119
WAR	0.1	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Griffin Canning	Cade Povich
G	143	46
GS	121	43
IP	668.0	229.0
W	36	8
L	46	18
SV	0	0
SO	636	215
BB	256	92
ERA	4.77	5.07
WHIP	1.36	1.47
K/9	8.6	8.4
BB/9	3.4	3.6
HR/9	1.5	1.4
WAR	4.4	1.7

Griffin Canning’s full profile →Cade Povich’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Griffin Canning vs

Cade Povich vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.