Head to head · 2025 batting

Sam Hilliard vs Tyler O'Neill

In 2025 the two have been worth the same 0.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Sam Hilliard COL

Tyler O'Neill BAL

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sam Hilliard	Tyler O'Neill
G	19	54
PA	61	209
H	10	36
HR	2	9
RBI	3	26
SB	2	4
AVG	.196	.199
OBP	.328	.292
SLG	.412	.392
OPS	.740	.684
ISO	.216	.193
BB%	16.4%	10.5%
K%	37.7%	24.4%
wOBA	.329	.299
wRC+	98	87
WAR	0.2	0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Sam Hilliard	Tyler O'Neill
G	301	712
PA	936	2,578
H	181	547
2B	32	99
3B	9	4
HR	44	128
RBI	107	327
BB	94	238
SO	321	773
SB	26	49
AVG	.218	.239
SLG	.437	.454
WAR	2.7	9.8

Sam Hilliard’s full profile →Tyler O'Neill’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sam Hilliard vs

Tyler O'Neill vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.