Head to head · 2026 pitching
Caleb Ferguson vs Richard Lovelady
In 2026 Caleb Ferguson has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Caleb Ferguson | Richard Lovelady |
|---|---|---|
| G | 35 | 38 |
| GS | 1 | 6 |
| IP | 33.0 | 35.0 |
| W | 1 | 3 |
| SO | 31 | 31 |
| ERA | 5.18 | 4.11 |
| FIP | 4.92 | 5.59 |
| WHIP | 1.70 | 1.86 |
| K/9 | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| BB/9 | 5.2 | 6.2 |
| FIP− | 118 | 134 |
| WAR | -0.1 | -0.3 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Caleb Ferguson | Richard Lovelady |
|---|---|---|
| G | 12 | — |
| GS | 0 | — |
| IP | 8.1 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 7 | — |
| BB | 5 | — |
| ERA | 5.40 | — |
| WHIP | 1.32 | — |
| K/9 | 7.6 | — |
| BB/9 | 5.4 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Caleb Ferguson | Richard Lovelady |
|---|---|---|
| G | 368 | 156 |
| GS | 15 | 6 |
| IP | 360.0 | 146.0 |
| W | 25 | 8 |
| L | 17 | 17 |
| SV | 7 | 7 |
| SO | 396 | 133 |
| BB | 148 | 66 |
| ERA | 3.80 | 5.05 |
| WHIP | 1.33 | 1.47 |
| K/9 | 9.9 | 8.2 |
| BB/9 | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| HR/9 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| WAR | 4.0 | 0.0 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
Caleb Ferguson vs
Richard Lovelady vs
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.