DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 ALDS pitching

Davis Martin vs Parker Messick

In 2026 Parker Messick has been worth 2.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
StatisticDavis MartinParker Messick
G12
GS02
IP1.06.2
W00
SV00
SO111
BB26
ERA18.005.40
WHIP4.001.80
K/99.014.8
BB/918.08.1
Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticDavis MartinParker Messick
G14
GS04
IP1.013.2
W00
SV00
SO117
BB210
ERA18.003.95
WHIP4.001.98
K/99.011.2
BB/918.06.6

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticDavis MartinParker Messick
G2932
GS2832
IP146.0186.1
W912
SO122193
ERA3.952.56
FIP3.833.07
WHIP1.321.06
K/97.59.3
BB/92.82.4
FIP−9273
WAR2.34.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticDavis MartinParker Messick
G8039
GS7239
IP402.0226.0
W1915
L2910
SV00
SO321231
BB13655
ERA4.192.59
WHIP1.321.11
K/97.29.2
BB/93.02.2
HR/91.10.8
WAR4.15.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.