Head to head · 2026 pitching

Peter Lambert vs Connor Prielipp

In 2026 Peter Lambert has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Peter Lambert HOU

Connor Prielipp MIN

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Peter Lambert	Connor Prielipp
G	29	24
GS	29	22
IP	155.2	125.2
W	8	6
SO	154	128
ERA	3.82	4.87
FIP	3.91	3.73
WHIP	1.25	1.29
K/9	8.9	9.2
BB/9	3.4	3.2
FIP−	94	89
WAR	2.3	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Peter Lambert	Connor Prielipp
G	103	24
GS	64	22
IP	399.1	125.2
W	16	6
L	29	7
SV	0	0
SO	335	128
BB	154	44
ERA	5.32	4.87
WHIP	1.47	1.29
K/9	7.6	9.2
BB/9	3.5	3.2
HR/9	1.4	1.0
WAR	2.1	2.1

Peter Lambert’s full profile →Connor Prielipp’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Peter Lambert vs

Connor Prielipp vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.