Head to head · 2026 batting
Cal Raleigh vs Trea Turner
In 2026 Trea Turner has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
2026 season
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | Trea Turner |
|---|---|---|
| G | 126 | 157 |
| PA | 530 | 700 |
| H | 82 | 156 |
| HR | 23 | 19 |
| RBI | 69 | 58 |
| SB | 2 | 21 |
| AVG | .182 | .242 |
| OBP | .296 | .297 |
| SLG | .368 | .378 |
| OPS | .664 | .675 |
| ISO | .186 | .136 |
| BB% | 13.6% | 6.9% |
| K% | 30.9% | 21.0% |
| wOBA | .299 | .299 |
| wRC+ | 90 | 83 |
| WAR | 1.5 | 2.3 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | Trea Turner |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 67 |
| PA | 78 | 301 |
| H | 19 | 69 |
| HR | 6 | 6 |
| RBI | 12 | 17 |
| BB | 10 | 19 |
| SO | 25 | 70 |
| SB | 0 | 14 |
| AVG | .279 | .249 |
| OBP | .372 | .299 |
| SLG | .588 | .368 |
| OPS | .960 | .667 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | Trea Turner |
|---|---|---|
| G | 744 | 1,416 |
| PA | 2,995 | 6,306 |
| H | 571 | 1,687 |
| 2B | 110 | 311 |
| 3B | 2 | 49 |
| HR | 176 | 205 |
| RBI | 445 | 699 |
| BB | 338 | 431 |
| SO | 860 | 1,175 |
| SB | 23 | 336 |
| AVG | .218 | .291 |
| SLG | .464 | .467 |
| WAR | 18.8 | 49.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

