DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Brady Singer vs Framber Valdez

In 2026 Framber Valdez has been worth 2.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBrady SingerFramber Valdez
G3131
GS3131
IP157.0174.0
W610
SO126135
ERA5.854.03
FIP5.624.14
WHIP1.591.36
K/97.27.0
BB/93.63.5
FIP−13499
WAR-0.82.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBrady SingerFramber Valdez
G117
GS016
IP0.185.0
W07
SV00
SO195
BB034
ERA0.004.34
WHIP0.001.36
K/927.010.1
BB/90.03.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBrady SingerFramber Valdez
G190219
GS187197
IP1,012.01,254.2
W5691
L7164
SV00
SO9341,188
BB336456
ERA4.483.46
WHIP1.351.23
K/98.38.5
BB/93.03.3
HR/91.20.7
WAR12.223.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.