Head to head · 2026 pitching
Brady Singer vs Shane Smith
In 2026 Shane Smith has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Brady Singer | Shane Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 31 | 3 |
| GS | 31 | 3 |
| IP | 157.0 | 8.1 |
| W | 6 | 0 |
| SO | 126 | 11 |
| ERA | 5.85 | 10.80 |
| FIP | 5.62 | 5.62 |
| WHIP | 1.59 | 2.52 |
| K/9 | 7.2 | 11.9 |
| BB/9 | 3.6 | 9.7 |
| FIP− | 134 | 134 |
| WAR | -0.8 | -0.0 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Brady Singer | Shane Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1 | — |
| GS | 0 | — |
| IP | 0.1 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 1 | — |
| BB | 0 | — |
| ERA | 0.00 | — |
| WHIP | 0.00 | — |
| K/9 | 27.0 | — |
| BB/9 | 0.0 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Brady Singer | Shane Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 190 | 32 |
| GS | 187 | 32 |
| IP | 1,012.0 | 154.2 |
| W | 56 | 7 |
| L | 71 | 10 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 934 | 156 |
| BB | 336 | 67 |
| ERA | 4.48 | 4.19 |
| WHIP | 1.35 | 1.27 |
| K/9 | 8.3 | 9.1 |
| BB/9 | 3.0 | 3.9 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| WAR | 12.2 | 1.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.