Head to head · 2025 pitching

Justin Lawrence vs Jordan Weems

In 2025 Justin Lawrence has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Justin Lawrence PIT

Jordan Weems HOU

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Justin Lawrence	Jordan Weems
G	17	4
GS	0	0
IP	17.2	4.1
W	1	0
SO	23	0
ERA	0.51	14.54
FIP	2.23	5.21
WHIP	0.96	2.77
K/9	11.7	0.0
BB/9	4.1	6.2
FIP−	54	125
WAR	0.5	-0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Justin Lawrence	Jordan Weems
G	236	144
GS	0	0
IP	246.0	160.0
W	13	6
L	15	5
SV	15	0
SO	254	161
BB	146	80
ERA	5.34	5.51
WHIP	1.61	1.42
K/9	9.3	9.1
BB/9	5.3	4.5
HR/9	1.0	1.5
WAR	0.9	-0.4

Justin Lawrence’s full profile →Jordan Weems’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Justin Lawrence vs

Jordan Weems vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.