DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Dean Kremer vs Casey Mize

In 2026 Casey Mize has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticDean KremerCasey Mize
G1726
GS1726
IP90.1131.1
W56
SO86110
ERA4.684.32
FIP4.794.15
WHIP1.141.23
K/98.67.5
BB/92.92.6
FIP−11499
WAR0.41.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticDean KremerCasey Mize
G12
GS12
IP1.26.0
W00
SV00
SO07
BB14
ERA32.403.00
WHIP4.801.17
K/90.010.5
BB/95.46.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticDean KremerCasey Mize
G143115
GS140113
IP762.0571.1
W4629
L4535
SV00
SO664475
BB251159
ERA4.314.22
WHIP1.271.27
K/97.87.5
BB/93.02.5
HR/91.31.3
WAR7.16.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.