Head to head · 2026 batting
Jeremy Peña vs Bobby Witt Jr.
In 2026 Bobby Witt Jr. has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2025 by dbWAR.
- Both near the front of the 2025 AL MVP race: among the league's 8 most valuable hitters by dbWAR.
- Two of the 6 most valuable shortstops of 2025 by dbWAR.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Bobby Witt Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 111 | 143 |
| PA | 483 | 632 |
| H | 124 | 156 |
| HR | 22 | 18 |
| RBI | 56 | 54 |
| SB | 12 | 45 |
| AVG | .277 | .280 |
| OBP | .325 | .358 |
| SLG | .477 | .439 |
| OPS | .802 | .797 |
| ISO | .199 | .159 |
| BB% | 5.0% | 10.6% |
| K% | 24.0% | 17.2% |
| wOBA | .348 | .346 |
| wRC+ | 123 | 114 |
| WAR | 3.8 | 4.9 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Bobby Witt Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 6 |
| PA | 119 | 27 |
| H | 32 | 5 |
| HR | 5 | 0 |
| RBI | 10 | 2 |
| BB | 4 | 1 |
| SO | 26 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .286 | .192 |
| OBP | .316 | .222 |
| SLG | .473 | .192 |
| OPS | .789 | .415 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jeremy Peña | Bobby Witt Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 678 | 769 |
| PA | 2,868 | 3,354 |
| H | 718 | 878 |
| 2B | 129 | 184 |
| 3B | 11 | 35 |
| HR | 86 | 123 |
| RBI | 303 | 427 |
| BB | 149 | 243 |
| SO | 584 | 596 |
| SB | 76 | 193 |
| AVG | .272 | .288 |
| SLG | .427 | .492 |
| WAR | 17.7 | 29.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

