DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Camilo Doval vs Reed Garrett

In 2025 Camilo Doval has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticCamilo DovalReed Garrett
G6958
GS01
IP65.155.1
W43
SO7264
ERA3.583.90
FIP3.473.46
WHIP1.321.32
K/99.910.4
BB/94.84.2
FIP−8383
WAR0.90.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticCamilo DovalReed Garrett
G67
GS00
IP7.08.1
W01
SV10
SO310
BB02
ERA2.575.40
WHIP0.710.84
K/93.910.8
BB/90.02.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticCamilo DovalReed Garrett
G363142
GS01
IP347.1157.0
W2912
L2112
SV1097
SO420179
BB17284
ERA3.524.76
WHIP1.321.53
K/910.910.3
BB/94.54.8
HR/90.71.0
WAR5.01.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.