DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Tommy Nance vs Cole Sulser

In 2026 Cole Sulser has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticTommy NanceCole Sulser
G5751
GS02
IP59.256.1
W31
SO6856
ERA3.924.31
FIP3.823.64
WHIP1.391.24
K/910.38.9
BB/93.62.7
FIP−9187
WAR0.60.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTommy NanceCole Sulser
G23
GS00
IP1.12.1
W00
SV00
SO02
BB11
ERA13.5015.43
WHIP4.503.00
K/90.07.7
BB/96.83.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticTommy NanceCole Sulser
G169208
GS24
IP185.2228.0
W811
L1014
SV018
SO206236
BB7495
ERA4.223.71
WHIP1.321.28
K/910.09.3
BB/93.63.7
HR/91.00.9
WAR2.22.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.