Head to head · 2026 pitching
Graham Ashcraft vs Jordan Hicks
In 2026 Jordan Hicks has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Graham Ashcraft | Jordan Hicks |
|---|---|---|
| G | 35 | 53 |
| GS | 0 | 2 |
| IP | 35.1 | 48.0 |
| W | 1 | 3 |
| SO | 40 | 64 |
| ERA | 4.08 | 3.94 |
| FIP | 3.70 | 3.64 |
| WHIP | 1.44 | 1.54 |
| K/9 | 10.2 | 12.0 |
| BB/9 | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| FIP− | 88 | 87 |
| WAR | 0.4 | 0.6 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Graham Ashcraft | Jordan Hicks |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1 | 7 |
| GS | 0 | 0 |
| IP | 1.0 | 7.1 |
| W | 0 | 1 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 0 | 10 |
| BB | 0 | 4 |
| ERA | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| WHIP | 2.00 | 0.82 |
| K/9 | 0.0 | 12.3 |
| BB/9 | 0.0 | 4.9 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Graham Ashcraft | Jordan Hicks |
|---|---|---|
| G | 157 | 328 |
| GS | 60 | 39 |
| IP | 428.2 | 468.1 |
| W | 26 | 20 |
| L | 26 | 37 |
| SV | 1 | 36 |
| SO | 343 | 473 |
| BB | 158 | 245 |
| ERA | 4.70 | 4.36 |
| WHIP | 1.42 | 1.41 |
| K/9 | 7.2 | 9.1 |
| BB/9 | 3.3 | 4.7 |
| HR/9 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| WAR | 3.9 | 4.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.