Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Stowers vs Spencer Torkelson

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 2.0 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Stowers MIA

Spencer Torkelson DET

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Stowers	Spencer Torkelson
G	121	159
PA	512	612
H	107	121
HR	21	26
RBI	65	77
SB	1	1
AVG	.239	.230
OBP	.331	.331
SLG	.459	.435
OPS	.789	.766
ISO	.219	.205
BB%	10.2%	11.6%
K%	31.4%	31.7%
wOBA	.343	.339
wRC+	120	117
WAR	2.0	2.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Stowers	Spencer Torkelson
G	343	675
PA	1,309	2,730
H	287	545
2B	63	126
3B	10	5
HR	52	106
RBI	173	314
BB	121	280
SO	401	738
SB	6	6
AVG	.248	.227
SLG	.454	.417
WAR	5.1	4.5

Kyle Stowers’s full profile →Spencer Torkelson’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Stowers vs

Spencer Torkelson vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.