Head to head · 2026 batting

Jeremiah Jackson vs Jose Trevino

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jeremiah Jackson BAL

Jose Trevino CIN

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jeremiah Jackson	Jose Trevino
G	92	47
PA	293	156
H	60	33
HR	10	5
RBI	45	19
SB	2	0
AVG	.217	.217
OBP	.247	.221
SLG	.365	.336
OPS	.611	.556
ISO	.148	.118
BB%	3.4%	0.6%
K%	23.5%	18.6%
wOBA	.264	.240
wRC+	64	47
WAR	-0.4	-0.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jeremiah Jackson	Jose Trevino
G	140	509
PA	476	1,732
H	107	381
2B	21	75
3B	2	1
HR	15	41
RBI	66	182
BB	21	77
SO	119	293
SB	2	4
AVG	.239	.235
SLG	.396	.358
WAR	0.2	1.1

Jeremiah Jackson’s full profile →Jose Trevino’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jeremiah Jackson vs

Jose Trevino vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.