DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Logan Gilbert vs Hunter Greene

In 2026 Logan Gilbert has been worth 2.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticLogan GilbertHunter Greene
G325
GS325
IP186.027.2
W122
SO20533
ERA3.736.83
FIP3.833.57
WHIP1.091.37
K/99.910.7
BB/92.42.9
FIP−9285
WAR2.90.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticLogan GilbertHunter Greene
G51
GS41
IP20.13.0
W10
SV00
SO194
BB52
ERA4.4315.00
WHIP1.432.67
K/98.412.0
BB/92.26.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticLogan GilbertHunter Greene
G17896
GS17896
IP1,021.1523.1
W5927
L4731
SV00
SO1,089650
BB230188
ERA3.603.82
WHIP1.061.15
K/99.611.2
BB/92.03.2
HR/91.21.3
WAR18.38.5

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.