Head to head · 2026 pitching

J.T. Ginn vs Brandon Young

In 2026 J.T. Ginn has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

J.T. Ginn ATH

Brandon Young BAL

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	J.T. Ginn	Brandon Young
G	27	28
GS	24	28
IP	138.1	156.2
W	9	9
SO	121	133
ERA	3.71	3.56
FIP	4.38	4.48
WHIP	1.24	1.35
K/9	7.9	7.6
BB/9	3.7	3.5
FIP−	105	107
WAR	1.7	1.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	J.T. Ginn	Brandon Young
G	58	40
GS	46	40
IP	262.2	214.1
W	14	10
L	16	13
SV	0	0
SO	249	180
BB	97	83
ERA	4.25	4.28
WHIP	1.29	1.40
K/9	8.5	7.6
BB/9	3.3	3.5
HR/9	1.3	1.4
WAR	2.6	1.2

J.T. Ginn’s full profile →Brandon Young’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

J.T. Ginn vs

Brandon Young vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.