Head to head · 2026 pitching

Shane Bieber vs Cade Povich

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Shane Bieber TOR

Cade Povich BAL

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Shane Bieber	Cade Povich
G	11	8
GS	11	7
IP	55.2	37.0
W	5	2
SO	44	28
ERA	4.53	4.38
FIP	5.15	5.00
WHIP	1.44	1.49
K/9	7.1	6.8
BB/9	3.9	3.6
FIP−	123	119
WAR	0.1	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Shane Bieber	Cade Povich
G	154	46
GS	152	43
IP	939.0	229.0
W	71	8
L	36	18
SV	0	0
SO	1,039	215
BB	219	92
ERA	3.32	5.07
WHIP	1.13	1.47
K/9	10.0	8.4
BB/9	2.1	3.6
HR/9	1.1	1.4
WAR	21.9	1.7

Shane Bieber’s full profile →Cade Povich’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Shane Bieber vs

Cade Povich vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.