Head to head · 2026 pitching

Andrew Abbott vs Matthew Boyd

In 2026 Matthew Boyd has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable pitchers of 2025 by dbWAR.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Andrew Abbott CIN

Matthew Boyd CHC

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Andrew Abbott	Matthew Boyd
G	32	22
GS	32	22
IP	166.0	126.2
W	6	10
SO	131	96
ERA	4.66	3.91
FIP	4.93	4.22
WHIP	1.45	1.21
K/9	7.1	6.8
BB/9	4.1	2.8
FIP−	118	101
WAR	0.5	1.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Andrew Abbott	Matthew Boyd
G	—	8
GS	—	7
IP	—	25.2
W	—	0
SV	—	0
SO	—	27
BB	—	13
ERA	—	2.81
WHIP	—	1.40
K/9	—	9.5
BB/9	—	4.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Andrew Abbott	Matthew Boyd
G	107	235
GS	107	221
IP	579.2	1,214.2
W	34	70
L	34	82
SV	0	0
SO	514	1,141
BB	215	375
ERA	3.77	4.50
WHIP	1.30	1.27
K/9	8.0	8.5
BB/9	3.3	2.8
HR/9	1.3	1.4
WAR	5.2	12.6

Andrew Abbott’s full profile →Matthew Boyd’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Andrew Abbott vs

Matthew Boyd vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.