Head to head · 2026 batting

Hunter Feduccia vs Connor Wong

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Hunter Feduccia TB

Connor Wong BOS

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Hunter Feduccia	Connor Wong
G	88	71
PA	251	238
H	48	49
HR	3	4
RBI	19	25
SB	0	3
AVG	.221	.233
OBP	.312	.308
SLG	.313	.348
OPS	.625	.655
ISO	.092	.114
BB%	11.2%	7.1%
K%	23.9%	23.9%
wOBA	.289	.297
wRC+	79	84
WAR	0.6	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Hunter Feduccia	Connor Wong
G	129	395
PA	370	1,386
H	65	306
2B	14	73
3B	1	4
HR	3	27
RBI	28	128
BB	45	89
SO	91	370
SB	1	21
AVG	.205	.243
SLG	.284	.372
WAR	0.4	4.4

Hunter Feduccia’s full profile →Connor Wong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Hunter Feduccia vs

Connor Wong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.