DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Slade Cecconi vs Anthony Kay

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.8 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticSlade CecconiAnthony Kay
G2833
GS2131
IP121.0158.0
W510
SO99129
ERA4.914.44
FIP4.554.76
WHIP1.431.37
K/97.47.3
BB/92.93.2
FIP−109114
WAR0.80.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticSlade CecconiAnthony Kay
G54
GS11
IP6.12.2
W01
SV00
SO80
BB13
ERA2.8410.13
WHIP1.112.25
K/911.40.0
BB/91.410.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticSlade CecconiAnthony Kay
G7877
GS6138
IP357.0243.1
W1414
L2211
SV00
SO292217
BB92103
ERA5.024.85
WHIP1.321.45
K/97.48.0
BB/92.33.8
HR/91.61.2
WAR1.91.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.