Head to head · 2026 pitching

Jack Perkins vs Alan Rangel

In 2026 Jack Perkins has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jack Perkins ATH

Alan Rangel PHI

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jack Perkins	Alan Rangel
G	37	7
GS	17	3
IP	121.0	26.0
W	3	0
SO	140	29
ERA	6.10	5.88
FIP	4.77	4.60
WHIP	1.45	1.69
K/9	10.4	10.0
BB/9	3.8	4.5
FIP−	114	110
WAR	0.6	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Jack Perkins	Alan Rangel
G	49	12
GS	21	3
IP	159.2	37.0
W	6	0
L	15	3
SV	6	1
SO	177	37
BB	69	19
ERA	5.64	4.86
WHIP	1.38	1.62
K/9	10.0	9.0
BB/9	3.9	4.6
HR/9	1.5	1.2
WAR	1.0	0.2

Jack Perkins’s full profile →Alan Rangel’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jack Perkins vs

Alan Rangel vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.